Models, Methods and Network Topology: Experimental Design for the Study of Interference
Jake Bowers, Bruce A. Desmarais, Mark Frederickson, Nahomi Ichino,, Hsuan-Wei Lee, Simi Wang

TL;DR
This paper explores how the propagation of treatments in social network experiments influences statistical power, emphasizing the importance of incorporating network dynamics and prior information into experimental design.
Contribution
It demonstrates that treatment propagation affects statistical power and advocates for integrating network information into experimental planning.
Findings
Treatment propagation impacts statistical power.
Prior network information enhances experimental design.
Degree-treatment correlation influences power.
Abstract
How should a network experiment be designed to achieve high statistical power? Ex- perimental treatments on networks may spread. Randomizing assignment of treatment to nodes enhances learning about the counterfactual causal effects of a social network experiment and also requires new methodology (ex. Aronow and Samii 2017a; Bow- ers et al. 2013; Toulis and Kao 2013). In this paper we show that the way in which a treatment propagates across a social network affects the statistical power of an ex- perimental design. As such, prior information regarding treatment propagation should be incorporated into the experimental design. Our findings justify reconsideration of standard practice in circumstances where units are presumed to be independent even in simple experiments: information about treatment effects is not maximized when we assign half the units to treatment and half to control. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
