How plausible are the proposed formation scenarios of CEMP-r/s stars?
Carlo Abate, Richard J. Stancliffe, and Zheng-Wei Liu

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the plausibility of various formation scenarios for CEMP-$r/s$ stars by comparing predicted and observed frequencies, highlighting discrepancies and suggesting the $i$-process as a potential explanation.
Contribution
It assesses the likelihood of proposed formation scenarios for CEMP-$r/s$ stars and explores the $i$-process as a possible origin, providing a comparison with observational data.
Findings
Most scenarios underestimate the observed CEMP-$r/s$ frequency by at least a factor of 5.
The independent enrichment model predicts about 22% CEMP-$r/s$ to CEMP-$s$ ratio, aligning with the lowest observed estimates.
Stars with properties predicted by the model are at least ten times rarer in observations.
Abstract
CEMP- stars are metal-poor stars with enhanced abundances of carbon and heavy elements associated with the slow (-) and rapid (-) neutron-capture process. It is believed that carbon and -elements were accreted from the wind of an AGB primary star, a scenario that is generally accepted to explain the formation of CEMP stars that are only enhanced in -elements (CEMP- stars). The origin of -element-enrichment in CEMP- stars is debated and many formation scenarios have been put forward. We aim to determine the likelihood of the scenarios proposed to explain the formation of CEMP- stars. We calculate the frequency of CEMP- stars among CEMP- stars for a variety of scenarios, and we compare it with that determined from an observed sample of CEMP- stars collected from the literature. The theoretical frequency of CEMP- stars predicted in most…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
