Criteria for three-stage towers of p-class fields
Daniel C. Mayer

TL;DR
This paper develops advanced invariants called generalized IPADs to better determine the structure of p-class field towers of number fields, especially in cases where previous methods faced computational limitations.
Contribution
It introduces multi-layered and iterated IPADs that provide more detailed data, enabling the identification of complex p-class tower groups and towers of exact length three.
Findings
Multi-layered IPADs yield sharper bounds for p-class groups.
Iterated IPADs identify p-class tower groups with tower length three.
New methods overcome previous computational limitations.
Abstract
Let p be a prime and K be a number field with non-trivial p-class group Cl(p,K). A crucial step in identifying the Galois group G=G(p,K) of the maximal unramified pro-p extension of K is to determine its two-stage approximation M=G(p,2,K), that is the second derived quotient M=G/G". The family tau(1,K) of abelian type invariants of the p-class groups Cl(p,L) of all unramified cyclic extensions L/K of degree p is called the index-p abelianization data (IPAD) of K. It is able to specify a finite batch of contestants for the second p-class group M of K. In this paper we introduce two different kinds of generalized IPADs for obtaining more sophisticated results. The multi-layered IPAD ((tau(1,K),tau(2,K)) includes data on unramified abelian extensions L/K of degree p^2 and enables sharper bounds for the order of M in the case Cl(p,K)=(p,p,p), where current implementations of the p-group…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering · Finite Group Theory Research · Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
