Clarifying possible misconceptions in the foundations of general relativity
Harvey R. Brown, James Read

TL;DR
This paper examines foundational misconceptions in general relativity, clarifying issues related to the equivalence principle, gravitational redshift, and the nature of gravity versus inertia.
Contribution
It identifies and clarifies three common misconceptions in the foundations of general relativity, enhancing conceptual understanding of key principles.
Findings
Clarifies the interpretation of the weak equivalence principle.
Explains the link between gravitational redshift and spacetime curvature.
Discusses the limitations of transforming away gravity in local inertial frames.
Abstract
We discuss what we take to be three possible misconceptions in the foundations of general relativity, relating to: (a) the interpretation of the weak equivalence principle and the relationship between gravity and inertia; (b) the connection between gravitational redshift results and spacetime curvature; and (c) the Einstein equivalence principle and the ability to "transform away" gravity in local inertial coordinate systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
