Cross-Cultural Differences in Students' Intention to Use RSS Feeds between Lebanon and the United Kingdom: A Multi-Group Invariance Analysis Based on the Technology Acceptance Model
Ali Tarhini, Michael James Scott

TL;DR
This study compares cross-cultural differences in students' intention to use RSS feeds in Lebanon and the UK, revealing cultural influences on perceived usefulness and ease of use, and suggesting targeted faculty interventions.
Contribution
It applies multi-group invariance analysis within the TAM framework to identify cultural effects on RSS adoption in higher education.
Findings
Higher adoption in the UK (36%) compared to Lebanon (21%)
Full configural and metric invariance supported
Significant differences in perceived usefulness and ease of use across cultures
Abstract
Really Simple Syndication (RSS) offers a means for university students to receive timely updates from virtual learning environments. However, despite its utility, only 21% of students surveyed at a Lebanese university claim to have ever used the technology. To investigate whether a cultural influence is affecting intention to use RSS, the survey was extended to the British context to conduct a cross-cultural comparison. Using the Technology Adoption Model (TAM) as a research framework, 437 students responded to a questionnaire containing four constructs: intention to use (INT); attitude towards benefit (ATT); perceived usefulness (PU); and perceived ease of use (PEOU). Principle components analysis (PCA) and structural equation modelling (SEM) were used to explore the psychometric qualities of the scale. The results show that adoption was significantly higher, but also modest, in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour · Knowledge Management and Sharing · Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
