Randomness: quantum versus classical
Andrei Khrennikov

TL;DR
This paper reviews the concepts of classical and quantum randomness, explores their differences, and discusses interpretations of quantum mechanics emphasizing information theory and digital philosophy.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of classical and quantum randomness and discusses modern information-based interpretations of quantum mechanics.
Findings
Quantum randomness is fundamentally irreducible.
Classical and quantum randomness differ in origin and nature.
Information interpretation offers a unifying perspective on quantum mechanics.
Abstract
Recent tremendous development of quantum information theory led to a number of quantum technological projects, e.g., quantum random generators. This development stimulates a new wave of interest in quantum foundations. One of the most intriguing problems of quantum foundations is elaboration of a consistent and commonly accepted interpretation of quantum state. Closely related problem is clarification of the notion of quantum randomness and its interrelation with classical randomness. In this short review we shall discuss basics of classical theory of randomness (which by itself is very complex and characterized by diversity of approaches) and compare it with irreducible quantum randomness. The second part of this review is devoted to the information interpretation of quantum mechanics (QM) in the spirit of Zeilinger and Brukner (and QBism of Fuchs et al.) and physics in general (e.g.,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Quantum Mechanics and Applications
