Characterization of the Very Low Mass Secondary in the GJ 660.1AB System
Christian Aganze (Morehouse College), Adam J. Burgasser (UCSD),, Jacqueline K. Faherty (Carnegie DTM/AMNH), Caleb Choban (UCSD), Ivanna Escala, (UCSD), Mike A. Lopez (UCSD), Yuhui Jin (UCSD), Tomoki Tamiya (UCSD), Melisa, Tallis (UCSD), and Willie Rockward (Morehouse College)

TL;DR
This study analyzes the low-mass binary GJ 660.1AB, revealing the secondary is a mild subdwarf with peculiar spectral features, highlighting challenges in modeling metal-poor ultracool dwarfs and interpreting their surface gravity indicators.
Contribution
It provides detailed spectroscopic characterization of GJ 660.1B, demonstrating discrepancies in spectral models and emphasizing the need for improved modeling of metal-poor, very-low mass stars.
Findings
GJ 660.1B is a mild subdwarf with [Fe/H] = -0.63
Spectral models show conflicting gravity and metallicity results
Spectral peculiarities highlight modeling challenges for metal-poor ultracool dwarfs
Abstract
We present spectroscopic analysis of the low mass binary star system GJ 660.1AB, a pair of nearby M dwarfs for which we have obtained separated near-infrared spectra (0.9-2.5 m) with the SpeX spectrograph. The spectrum of GJ 660.1B is distinctly peculiar, with a triangular-shaped 1.7 m peak that initially suggests it to be a low surface gravity, young brown dwarf. However, we rule out this hypothesis and determine instead that this companion is a mild subdwarf (d/sdM7) based on the subsolar metallicity of the primary, [Fe/H] = 0.630.06. Comparison of the near-infrared spectrum of GJ 660.1B to two sets of spectral models yields conflicting results, with a common effective temperature T = 2550-2650 K, but alternately low surface gravity ( = 4.40.5 cgs) and very low metallicity ([M/H] = 0.96), or high surface gravity ( =…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
