Reduction rules for the maximum parsimony distance on phylogenetic trees
Steven Kelk, Mareike Fischer, Vincent Moulton, Taoyang Wu

TL;DR
This paper introduces fixed parameter tractability results for computing the maximum parsimony (MP) distance between phylogenetic trees, using reduction rules and logical frameworks to relate it to TBR distance.
Contribution
It presents reduction rules that preserve MP distance and demonstrates fixed parameter tractability of MP distance in terms of TBR distance using MSOL logic.
Findings
Reducing chains to length 4 preserves MP distance.
Generalized subtree reduction maintains MP distance.
MSOL logic provides an alternative proof of fixed parameter tractability.
Abstract
In phylogenetics, distances are often used to measure the incongruence between a pair of phylogenetic trees that are reconstructed by different methods or using different regions of genome. Motivated by the maximum parsimony principle in tree inference, we recently introduced the maximum parsimony (MP) distance, which enjoys various attractive properties due to its connection with several other well-known tree distances, such as TBR and SPR. Here we show that computing the MP distance between two trees, a NP-hard problem in general, is fixed parameter tractable in terms of the TBR distance between the tree pair. Our approach is based on two reduction rules--the chain reduction and the subtree reduction--that are widely used in computing TBR and SPR distances. More precisely, we show that reducing chains to length 4 (but not shorter) preserves the MP distance. In addition, we describe a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies · Genome Rearrangement Algorithms · RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
