Development of a low background liquid scintillation counter for a shallow underground laboratory
J. L. Erchinger, C. E. Aalseth, B. E. Bernacki, M. Douglas, and E. S. Fuller, M. E. Keillor, S. M. Morley, C. A. Mullen, J., L. Orrell, M. E. Panisko, G. A. Warren, R. O. Williams, M. E., Wright

TL;DR
This paper describes the design and background evaluation of a low-background liquid scintillation counter developed for a shallow underground laboratory to enhance detection sensitivity of radioactive isotopes.
Contribution
It introduces a new low-background liquid scintillation counter optimized for shallow underground environments, including its design and background assessment.
Findings
Simulations show effective background reduction in the underground setting
Design achieves low background levels suitable for sensitive isotope detection
Counter enhances measurement capabilities for charged particle emitting isotopes
Abstract
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory has recently opened a shallow underground laboratory intended for measurement of low-concentration levels of radioactive isotopes in samples collected from the environment. The development of a low-background liquid scintillation counter is currently underway to further augment the measurement capabilities within this underground laboratory. Liquid scintillation counting is especially useful for measuring charged particle (e.g., , ) emitting isotopes with no (or very weak) gamma-ray yields. The combination of high-efficiency detection of charged particle emission in a liquid scintillation cocktail coupled with the low-background environment of an appropriately-designed shield located in a clean underground laboratory provides the opportunity for increased-sensitivity measurements of a range of isotopes. To take advantage of the 35…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
