That's How We Roll: The NASA K2 Mission Science Products and Their Performance Metrics
Jeffrey E. Van Cleve, Steve B. Howell, Jeffrey C. Smith, Bruce D., Clarke, Susan E. Thompson, Stephen T. Bryson, Mikkel N. Lund, Rasmus, Handberg, William J. Chaplin

TL;DR
The paper evaluates the performance of NASA's K2 mission, highlighting how it maintains high photometric precision despite increased pointing errors, through new data processing metrics and analysis of its scientific capabilities.
Contribution
It introduces specific performance metrics for K2, demonstrating how the mission preserves data quality and scientific output despite hardware limitations.
Findings
Photometric precision near 30 ppm at the field center for 12th magnitude stars.
Data compression and noise increase linearly with distance from the field center.
Test signals are preserved with less than 10% attenuation for periods up to 15 days.
Abstract
NASA's exoplanet Discovery mission Kepler was reconstituted as the K2 mission a year after the failure of the 2nd of Kepler's 4 reaction wheels in May 2013. The new spacecraft pointing method now gives typical roll motion of 1.0 pixels peak-to-peak over 6 hours at the edges of the field, two orders of magnitude greater than for Kepler. Despite these roll errors, the flight system and its modified science data processing pipeline restores much of the photometric precision of the primary mission while viewing a wide variety of targets, thus turning adversity into diversity. We define metrics for data compression and pixel budget available in each campaign; the photometric noise on exoplanet transit and stellar activity time scales; residual correlations in corrected long cadence light curves; and the protection of test sinusoidal signals from overfitting in the systematic error removal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
