Breaking the Curve with CANDELS: A Bayesian Approach to Reveal the Non-Universality of the Dust-Attenuation Law at High Redshift
Brett Salmon, Casey Papovich, James Long, S. P. Willner, Steven, Finkelstein, Henry C. Ferguson, Mark Dickinson, Kenneth Duncan, S. M. Faber,, Nimish Hathi, Anton Koekemoer, Peter Kurczynski, Jeffery Newman, Camilla, Pacifici, Pablo G. Perez-Gonzalez, Janine Pforr

TL;DR
This study uses a Bayesian approach to analyze galaxy spectral energy distributions at high redshift, revealing that the dust-attenuation law varies with galaxy properties and is not universal, challenging previous assumptions.
Contribution
It introduces an empirical model linking dust law shape to galaxy color excess and demonstrates the non-universality of dust attenuation laws at high redshift.
Findings
Dust law shape correlates with color excess, not stellar mass or SFR.
Galaxies with high E(B-V) have starburst-like dust laws.
Galaxies with low E(B-V) have SMC-like dust laws.
Abstract
Dust attenuation affects nearly all observational aspects of galaxy evolution, yet very little is known about the form of the dust-attenuation law in the distant Universe. Here, we model the spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of galaxies at z = 1.5--3 from CANDELS with rest-frame UV to near-IR imaging under different assumptions about the dust law, and compare the amount of inferred attenuated light with the observed infrared (IR) luminosities. Some individual galaxies show strong Bayesian evidence in preference of one dust law over another, and this preference agrees with their observed location on the plane of infrared excess (IRX, ) and UV slope (). We generalize the shape of the dust law with an empirical model, where is the dust law of Calzetti et al. (2000), and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
