First interpretation of the 750 GeV di-photon resonance at the LHC
Stefano Di Chiara, Luca Marzola, and Martti Raidal

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the 750 GeV di-photon resonance signals reported by ATLAS and CMS, exploring their implications for various beyond Standard Model theories, and finds that simple models can explain the signals while more complex ones require extensions.
Contribution
It provides the first interpretation of the 750 GeV di-photon resonance and assesses its compatibility with different beyond Standard Model theories, highlighting minimal extensions that can explain the signal.
Findings
A simple singlet extension of the Standard Model can explain the resonance.
Minimal supersymmetric and two Higgs doublet models cannot account for the excess without extensions.
Heavy vector quarks are needed in some models to fit the observed signal.
Abstract
We scrutinise the evidences recently reported by the ATLAS and CMS collaborations for compatible 750 GeV resonances which appear in the di-photon channels of the two experiments in both the 8 TeV and 13 TeV datasets. Similar resonances in di-boson, di-lepton, di-jet and final states are instead not detected. After discussing the properties and the compatibility of the reported signals, we study the implications on the physics beyond the Standard Model with particular emphasis on possible scalar extensions of the theory such as singlet extensions and the two Higgs doublet models. We also analyse the significance of the new experimental indications within the frameworks of the minimal supersymmetric standard model and of technicolour models. Our results show that a simple effective singlet extension of the SM achieves phenomenological viability with a minimal number of free…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
