Antilinearity Rather than Hermiticity as a Guiding Principle for Quantum Theory
Philip D. Mannheim

TL;DR
This paper argues that antilinear symmetries like $PT$ and $CPT$ are more fundamental than Hermiticity in quantum theory, extending the $CPT$ theorem to non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and emphasizing symmetry conditions in classical and quantum formulations.
Contribution
It establishes $CPT$ as the fundamental symmetry for non-Hermitian theories, extending the $CPT$ theorem and clarifying the role of antilinear symmetries beyond Hermiticity.
Findings
$CPT$ symmetry uniquely specifies antilinear symmetry in quantum theories.
Hermiticity is a property of solutions, not a fundamental requirement.
Classical action construction requires imposing $CPT$ symmetry on paths.
Abstract
Currently there is much interest in Hamiltonians that are not Hermitian but instead possess an antilinear symmetry, since such Hamiltonians can still lead to the time-independent evolution of scalar products, and can still have an entirely real energy spectrum. However, such theories can also admit of energy spectra in which energies come in complex conjugate pairs, and can even admit of Hamiltonians that cannot be diagonalized at all. Hermiticity is just a particular realization of symmetry, with symmetry being the more general. These theories are themselves part of an even broader class of theories, theories that can be characterized by possessing some general antilinear symmetry, as that requirement alone is a both necessary and sufficient condition for the time-independent evolution of scalar products, with all the different realizations of the symmetry…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
