Faint COSMOS AGN at z~3.3 - I. Black Hole Properties and Constraints on Early Black Hole Growth
Benny Trakhtenbrot, Francesca Civano, C. Megan Urry, Kevin Schawinski,, Stefano Marchesi, Martin Elvis, David Rosario, Hyewon Suh, Julian, Mejia-Restrepo, Brooke Simmons, Andreas Faisst, and Masato Onodera

TL;DR
This study uses Keck/MOSFIRE spectroscopy to analyze faint AGNs at z~3.3, revealing lower black hole masses and accretion rates than brighter quasars, and discusses implications for early black hole growth and obscuration evolution.
Contribution
First detailed spectroscopic analysis of faint, high-redshift AGNs, providing insights into black hole properties and early growth constraints at lower luminosities.
Findings
Black holes have typical masses around 5×10^8 M_Sol.
Accretion rates are between 0.1 and 0.5 L/L_Edd.
No evidence of a large population of lower-mass, faint AGNs at z~6.
Abstract
We present new Keck/MOSFIRE K-band spectroscopy for a sample of 14 faint, X-ray-selected active galactic nuclei (AGNs) in the COSMOS field. The data cover the spectral region surrounding the broad Balmer emission lines, which enables the estimation of black hole masses (M_BH) and accretion rates (in terms of L/L_Edd). We focus on 10 AGN at z~3.3, where we observe the Hbeta spectral region, while for the other four z~2.4 sources we use the Halpha broad emission line. Compared with previous detailed studies of unobscured AGNs at these high redshifts, our sources are fainter by an order of magnitude, corresponding to number densities of order ~10^-6--10^-5 Mpc^-3. The lower AGN luminosities also allow for a robust identification of the host galaxy emission, necessary to obtain reliable intrinsic AGN luminosities, BH masses and accretion rates. We find the AGNs in our sample to be powered…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
