The dynamics of Wolf numbers based on nonlinear dynamo with magnetic helicity: comparisons with observations
Ya. Kleeorin (1), N. Safiullin (2), N. Kleeorin (1,3), S. Porshnev, (2), I. Rogachevskii (1,3), D. Sokoloff (4) ((1) Ben-Gurion Univ., (2) Ural, Federal Univ., (3) NORDITA, (4) Moscow State Univ.)

TL;DR
This paper models solar activity dynamics using a nonlinear dynamo approach incorporating magnetic helicity, successfully reproducing observed Wolf number variations and cycle characteristics with high correlation to historical data.
Contribution
It introduces a novel nonlinear dynamo model with magnetic helicity effects and a new evolution equation for Wolf numbers, aligning simulations closely with observations.
Findings
70% correlation between simulations and 270-year observational data
Dependence of Wolf number maximum on cycle period
Cycle asymmetry correlates with cycle amplitude
Abstract
We investigate the dynamics of solar activity using a nonlinear one-dimensional dynamo model and a phenomenological equation for the evolution of Wolf numbers. This system of equations is solved numerically. We take into account the algebraic and dynamic nonlinearities of the alpha effect. The dynamic nonlinearity is related to the evolution of a small-scale magnetic helicity, and it leads to a complicated behavior of solar activity. The evolution equation for the Wolf number is based on a mechanism of formation of magnetic spots as a result of the negative effective magnetic pressure instability (NEMPI). This phenomenon was predicted 25 years ago and has been investigated intensively in recent years through direct numerical simulations and mean-field simulations. The evolution equation for the Wolf number includes the production and decay of sunspots. Comparison between the results of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
