Perturbed Newtonian description of the Lema\^itre model with non-negligible pressure
Kazuhiro Yamamoto, Valerio Marra, Viatcheslav Mukhanov, Misao Sasaki

TL;DR
This paper investigates the validity of the Newtonian approximation in cosmological perturbations within the Lemaitre model, especially for fluids with pressure like radiation, revealing conditions under which anisotropic stress arises and the approximation holds.
Contribution
It extends previous Newtonian analyses from dust to relativistic fluids with pressure, providing exact nonlinear insights into anisotropic stress onset and perturbation validity.
Findings
Newtonian description valid for sub-horizon inhomogeneities even with nonlinear density contrast.
Anisotropic stress arises when inhomogeneity scale is smaller than the sound horizon due to nonlinear fluid effects.
Relation + differs from dust case, depending on scale, amplitude, and fluid properties.
Abstract
We study the validity of the Newtonian description of cosmological perturbations using the Lemaitre model, an exact spherically symmetric solution of Einstein's equation. This problem has been investigated in the past for the case of a dust fluid. Here, we extend the previous analysis to the more general case of a fluid with non-negligible pressure, and, for the numerical examples, we consider the case of radiation (P=\rho/3). We find that, even when the density contrast has a nonlinear amplitude, the Newtonian description of the cosmological perturbations using the gravitational potential \psi and the curvature potential \phi is valid as long as we consider sub-horizon inhomogeneities. However, the relation \psi+\phi={\cal O}(\phi^2), which holds for the case of a dust fluid, is not valid for a relativistic fluid and effective anisotropic stress is generated. This demonstrates the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
