Two Dimensional Honeycomb Materials: random fields, dissipation and fluctuations
T. Frederico, O. Oliveira, W. de Paula, M. S. Hussein, T. R. Cardoso

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel method using Gaussian random fields to model many-electron interactions in honeycomb materials, leading to effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonians that explain dissipation and fluctuations observed in experiments.
Contribution
The work develops a new approach incorporating random fields into many-body electron problems, resulting in a dissipative effective Hamiltonian and improved understanding of fluctuation-dissipation phenomena in honeycomb materials.
Findings
Eigenstates of the effective Hamiltonian are complex, indicating finite lifetimes.
Theoretical predictions of charge carrier width $Gamma$ match experimental data for graphene.
The approach successfully models dissipation and fluctuations in honeycomb materials.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a method to describe the many-body problem of electrons in honeycomb materials via the introduction of random fields which are coupled to the electrons and have a Gaussian distribution. From a one-body approach to the problem, after integrating exactly the contribution of the random fields, one builds a non-hermitian and dissipative effective Hamiltonian with two-body interactions. Our approach introduces besides the usual average over the electron field a second average over the random fields. The interplay of two averages enables the definition of various types of Green's functions which allow the investigation of fluctuation-dissipation characteristics of the interactions that are a manifestation of the many-body problem. In the current work we study only the dissipative term, through the perturbative analysis of the dynamics associated the effective…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
