New models for the evolution of Post-Asymptotic Giant Branch stars and Central Stars of Planetary Nebulae
Marcelo M. Miller Bertolami

TL;DR
This study introduces new post-AGB star models with updated physics, showing significantly shorter timescales and higher brightness, which better align with recent observations and impact planetary nebulae evolution theories.
Contribution
The paper presents a comprehensive grid of post-AGB evolutionary models incorporating recent physics, providing more accurate timescales and luminosities for low- and intermediate-mass stars.
Findings
Post-AGB timescales are 3 to 10 times shorter than previous models.
New models are 0.1 to 0.3 dex brighter for similar remnant masses.
Results align with recent observational estimates of post-AGB timescales.
Abstract
The Post Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) phase is arguably one of the least understood phases of the evolution of low- and intermediate- mass stars. The two grids of models presently available are based on outdated micro- and macro-physics and do not agree with each other. We study the timescales of post-AGB and CSPNe in the context of our present understanding of the micro- and macro-physics of stars. We want to assess whether new post-AGB models, based on the latter improvements in TP-AGB modeling, can help to understand the discrepancies between observation and theory and within theory itself. We compute a grid of post-AGB full evolutionary sequences that include all previous evolutionary stages from the Zero Age Main Sequence to the White Dwarf phase. Models are computed for initial masses between 0.8 and 4 and for a wide range of initial metallicities (0.02, 0.01,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
