The XXL Survey. XIII. Baryon content of the bright cluster sample
D. Eckert, S. Ettori, J. Coupon, F. Gastaldello, M. Pierre, J.-B., Melin, A. M. C. Le Brun, I. G. McCarthy, C. Adami, L. Chiappetti, L., Faccioli, P. Giles, S. Lavoie, J. P. Lefevre, M. Lieu, A. Mantz, B. Maughan,, S. McGee, F. Pacaud, S. Paltani, T. Sadibekova, G. P. Smith

TL;DR
This study investigates the baryon content in galaxy clusters from the XXL Survey, revealing a lower baryon fraction than expected and implications for feedback processes and mass estimates.
Contribution
It provides new measurements of gas fractions using weak-lensing calibrated masses, highlighting a significant baryon deficit and suggesting a need to revise cluster mass estimates.
Findings
Gas fraction scales with mass as $f_{gas,500} \\propto M_{500}^{0.21}$
Baryon fraction is about half the Universal value at $r_{500}$
Weak-lensing calibrated masses imply a hydrostatic bias of ~0.72
Abstract
Traditionally, galaxy clusters have been expected to retain all the material accreted since their formation epoch. For this reason, their matter content should be representative of the Universe as a whole, and thus their baryon fraction should be close to the Universal baryon fraction. We make use of the sample of the 100 brightest galaxy clusters discovered in the XXL Survey to investigate the fraction of baryons in the form of hot gas and stars in the cluster population. We measure the gas masses of the detected halos and use a mass--temperature relation directly calibrated using weak-lensing measurements for a subset of XXL clusters to estimate the halo mass. We find that the weak-lensing calibrated gas fraction of XXL-100-GC clusters is substantially lower than was found in previous studies using hydrostatic masses. Our best-fit relation between gas fraction and mass reads $f_{\rm…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
