Improved Limits on Scattering of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles from Reanalysis of 2013 LUX data
LUX Collaboration: D. S. Akerib, H. M. Ara\'ujo, X. Bai, A. J. Bailey,, J. Balajthy, P. Beltrame, E. P. Bernard, A. Bernstein, T. P. Biesiadzinski,, E. M. Boulton, A. Bradley, R. Bramante, S. B. Cahn, M. C. Carmona-Benitez, C., Chan, J. J. Chapman, A. A. Chiller, C. Chiller

TL;DR
This paper presents improved constraints on WIMP-nucleus scattering using reanalyzed 2013 LUX data, incorporating calibration and background modeling advances, resulting in the most stringent limits for WIMP masses above 4 GeV/c².
Contribution
The study introduces new calibration methods and background models that significantly enhance sensitivity to low-mass WIMPs in dark matter detection.
Findings
Most stringent direct limits on spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross section above 4 GeV/c².
90% C.L. upper limit of 0.6 zb at 33 GeV/c² WIMP mass.
Enhanced sensitivity to low-mass WIMPs compared to previous analyses.
Abstract
We present constraints on weakly interacting massive particles (WIMP)-nucleus scattering from the 2013 data of the Large Underground Xenon dark matter experiment, including of search exposure. This new analysis incorporates several advances: single-photon calibration at the scintillation wavelength, improved event-reconstruction algorithms, a revised background model including events originating on the detector walls in an enlarged fiducial volume, and new calibrations from decays of an injected tritium source and from kinematically constrained nuclear recoils down to 1.1 keV. Sensitivity, especially to low-mass WIMPs, is enhanced compared to our previous results which modeled the signal only above a 3 keV minimum energy. Under standard dark matter halo assumptions and in the mass range above 4 , these new results give…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
