The Kepler Dichotomy in Planetary Disks: Linking Kepler Observables to Simulations of Late-Stage Planet Formation
John Moriarty, Sarah Ballard

TL;DR
This study uses simulations of late-stage planet formation to explain the Kepler dichotomy, showing that variations in initial disk properties can account for different planetary system architectures observed by Kepler.
Contribution
It introduces a model linking initial planetesimal disk profiles to observed planetary system diversity, explaining the Kepler dichotomy across stellar types.
Findings
Mixture models recover Kepler planet multiplicity and period distributions.
Short-period planets are likely stable, 'frozen-in' systems.
The Kepler dichotomy varies with stellar type, more prevalent around M dwarfs.
Abstract
NASA's Kepler Mission uncovered a wealth of planetary systems, many with planets on short-period orbits. These short-period systems reside around 50% of Sun-like stars and are similarly prevalent around M dwarfs. Their formation and subsequent evolution is the subject of active debate. In this paper, we simulate late-stage, in-situ planet formation across a grid of planetesimal disks with varying surface density profiles and total mass. We compare simulation results with observable characteristics of the Kepler sample. We identify mixture models with different primordial planetesimal disk properties that self-consistently recover the multiplicity, period ratio and duration ratio distributions of the Kepler planets. We draw three main conclusions: (1) We favor a "frozen-in" narrative for systems of short period planets, in which they are stable over long timescales, as opposed to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
