Inflation with an extra light scalar field after Planck
Vincent Vennin, Kazuya Koyama, David Wands

TL;DR
This paper uses Bayesian inference to analyze how an extra light scalar field during inflation affects model viability, finding that most single-field models remain robust, with specific exceptions like quartic large-field inflation.
Contribution
It introduces a numerical pipeline to evaluate inflation models with an additional light scalar field and assesses their viability using Bayesian methods.
Findings
Single-field models are generally robust with added light scalar fields.
Most models do not improve significantly with extra fields unless fine-tuned.
Quartic large-field inflation remains viable with an extra scalar in specific scenarios.
Abstract
Bayesian inference techniques are used to investigate situations where an additional light scalar field is present during inflation and reheating. This includes (but is not limited to) curvaton-type models. We design a numerical pipeline where inflaton setups reheating scenarios models are implemented and we present the results for a few prototypical potentials. We find that single-field models are remarkably robust under the introduction of light scalar degrees of freedom. Models that are ruled out at the single-field level are not improved in general, because good values of the spectral index and the tensor-to-scalar ratio can only be obtained for very fine-tuned values of the extra field parameters and/or when large non-Gaussianities are produced. The only exception is quartic large-field inflation, so that the best models after Planck are of two…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
