Josephson systems based on ballistic point contacts between single-band and multi-band superconductors
Y.S. Yerin, A.S. Kiyko, A.N. Omelyanchouk, E. Il'ichev

TL;DR
This paper investigates the Josephson effect in ballistic point contacts between single-band and multi-band superconductors, revealing frustration and multiple energy minima, and explores the behavior of dc SQUIDs based on these junctions, providing tools for detecting multi-band structures and BTRS.
Contribution
It introduces the analysis of Josephson junctions involving multi-band superconductors and demonstrates how their unique properties affect SQUID behavior, aiding experimental detection of multi-band and BTRS states.
Findings
Josephson junctions become frustrated with multiple energy minima.
Behavior of dc SQUIDs varies with multi-band superconductor type.
Features in critical current and magnetic flux dependences differ from conventional SQUIDs.
Abstract
The Josephson effect in ballistic point contacts between single-band and multi-band superconductors was investigated. It was found that in the case of Josephson junctions formed by a single-band and an -wave two-band superconductor as well as by a single-band and a three-band superconductor the junctions become frustrated, demonstrating the -contact properties. Depending on the ground state of a three-band superconductor with broken time-reversal symmetry (BTRS), the Josephson junction can have from one to three energy minima, some of which can be locally stable. We also study the behavior of a dc SQUID based on the Josephson junctions between single-band and multi-band superconductors. Some features on the dependences of the critical current and the total magnetic flux on the applied flux of a dc SQUID based on the Josephson point contacts between a single-band…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
