Learning measures of semi-additive behaviour
Hamidreza Chinaei, Mohsen Rais-Ghasem, Frank Rudzicz

TL;DR
This paper proposes a feature-based, case-based reasoning method to automatically determine the appropriate semi-additive aggregation behavior of measures in business analytics, achieving high accuracy.
Contribution
It introduces a novel set of features and a reasoning approach to automate measure aggregation decisions, reducing reliance on human expertise.
Findings
Achieved 86% accuracy in predicting aggregation behavior.
Developed a small feature set for measure behavior classification.
Demonstrated effectiveness in a real-world dataset.
Abstract
In business analytics, measure values, such as sales numbers or volumes of cargo transported, are often summed along values of one or more corresponding categories, such as time or shipping container. However, not every measure should be added by default (e.g., one might more typically want a mean over the heights of a set of people); similarly, some measures should only be summed within certain constraints (e.g., population measures need not be summed over years). In systems such as Watson Analytics, the exact additive behaviour of a measure is often determined by a human expert. In this work, we propose a small set of features for this issue. We use these features in a case-based reasoning approach, where the system suggests an aggregation behaviour, with 86% accuracy in our collected dataset.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsData Mining Algorithms and Applications · Advanced Text Analysis Techniques · Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
