On discrete values of bilinear forms
Alex Iosevich, Oliver Roche-Newton, Misha Rudnev

TL;DR
This paper corrects a previous claim about the size of the set of values of a bilinear form on finite point sets, establishing new lower bounds and discussing open problems in the area.
Contribution
It provides a corrected lower bound for the set of bilinear form values and introduces sum-product estimates for specific sets, highlighting unresolved issues in the field.
Findings
Lower bound of (N^{9/13}) for the set of bilinear form values
Sum-product estimates: |AA+AA|= |A|^{19/12} and |AA-AA|= |A|^{26/17}/( ext{log}^{2/17}|A|)
Discussion of the open problem regarding the ( ext{N}/ ext{log N}) estimate
Abstract
This paper is an erratum to our paper, entitled "On an application of Guth-Katz theorem", Math. Res. Lett. 18 (2011), no. 4, 691-697. Let be the real or complex field and a non-degenerate skew-symmetric bilinear form in the plane . We prove that for finite a point set , the set of nonzero values of in , if nonempty, has cardinality A presumably near-sharp estimate was claimed in the abovemnetioned paper over the reals for a symmetric or skew-symmetric form . However, the set-up for the proof was flawed. We discuss why we believe that justifying this claim in full strength is a major open problem. In the special case when , where is a set of at least two reals, we establish the following sum-product type estimates: $$ |AA+ AA|= \Omega…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
