Comment on "Structure of the two-neutrino double-\beta\ decay matrix elements within perturbation theory" by Du\v{s}an \v{S}tef\'anik, Fedor \v{S}imkovic, Amand Faessler, arXiv:1506.00835 [nucl-th], Phys.Rev.C91 (2015) 6, 064311

TL;DR

This paper critically discusses a prior claim regarding the structure of two-neutrino double-beta decay matrix elements within perturbation theory, emphasizing the importance of accurate attribution and interpretation in nuclear physics research.

Contribution

It provides a commentary clarifying the authorship and interpretation issues related to the previous work on double-beta decay matrix elements.

Findings

Highlights the importance of proper attribution in scientific claims

Clarifies the interpretation of perturbation theory results in double-beta decay

Emphasizes the need for careful analysis in nuclear matrix element studies

Abstract

We comment on a priority claim given by the authors of Phys.Rev.C91 (2015) 6, 064311.