
TL;DR
This paper proves that in rings where involutions are sums of idempotents and nilpotents, the idempotent must be 1, leading to a complete characterization of weakly nil-clean rings.
Contribution
It establishes a key property of involutions in rings and fully characterizes weakly nil-clean rings, advancing understanding of their algebraic structure.
Findings
Involutions as sums of idempotents and nilpotents have idempotent equal to 1.
Complete characterization of weakly nil-clean rings.
Clarifies the structure of rings with involutions.
Abstract
We prove that if an involution in a ring is the sum of an idempotent and a nilpotent then the idempotent in this decomposition must be 1. As a consequence, we completely characterize weakly nil-clean rings introduced recently in [Breaz, Danchev and Zhou, Rings in which every element is either a sum or a difference of a nilpotent and an idempotent, J. Algebra Appl., DOI: 10.1142/S0219498816501486].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRings, Modules, and Algebras · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
