What is the Computational Value of Finite Range Tunneling?
Vasil S. Denchev, Sergio Boixo, Sergei V. Isakov, Nan Ding, and Ryan Babbush, Vadim Smelyanskiy, John Martinis, Hartmut Neven

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that finite range tunneling in quantum annealing provides significant computational advantages over classical algorithms like simulated annealing and quantum Monte Carlo, especially for problems with tall, narrow energy barriers.
Contribution
The study provides empirical evidence that finite range tunneling offers a substantial speedup in quantum annealing compared to classical and emulated quantum algorithms, and discusses implications for future hardware design.
Findings
Quantum annealer outperforms simulated annealing by up to 10^8 times on specific problems.
Quantum annealer is up to 10^8 times faster than optimized Quantum Monte Carlo simulations.
For certain classical problems, quantum-inspired algorithms scale better than simulated annealing.
Abstract
Quantum annealing (QA) has been proposed as a quantum enhanced optimization heuristic exploiting tunneling. Here, we demonstrate how finite range tunneling can provide considerable computational advantage. For a crafted problem designed to have tall and narrow energy barriers separating local minima, the D-Wave 2X quantum annealer achieves significant runtime advantages relative to Simulated Annealing (SA). For instances with 945 variables, this results in a time-to-99%-success-probability that is times faster than SA running on a single processor core. We also compared physical QA with Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC), an algorithm that emulates quantum tunneling on classical processors. We observe a substantial constant overhead against physical QA: D-Wave 2X again runs up to times faster than an optimized implementation of QMC on a single core. We note that there…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
