Bright and Faint Ends of Ly$\alpha$ Luminosity Functions at $\textit{z} = 2$ Determined by the Subaru Survey: Implications for AGN, Magnification Bias, and ISM HI Evolution
Akira Konno, Masami Ouchi, Kimihiko Nakajima, Florent Duval, Haruka, Kusakabe, Yoshiaki Ono, Kazuhiro Shimasaku

TL;DR
This study uses a large Subaru survey to accurately determine the Lyα luminosity function at z=2.2, revealing a steep faint-end slope, a bright-end AGN hump, and implications for galaxy evolution, AGN activity, and interstellar medium properties.
Contribution
It provides the most accurate Lyα luminosity function at z=2.2 with a large sample, identifies AGN contributions at the bright end, and links Lyα escape fraction evolution to HI density changes in the ISM.
Findings
Steep faint-end slope of the Lyα LF at z=2.2.
Bright-end hump caused by AGNs, not lensing.
Increase in Lyα escape fraction from z=0 to 6.
Abstract
We present the Lya luminosity functions (LFs) derived by our deep Subaru narrowband survey that identifies a total of 3,137 Lya emitters (LAEs) at in five independent blank fields. The sample of these LAEs is the largest, to date, and covers a very wide Lya luminosity range of erg s. We determine the Lya LF at with unprecedented accuracies, and obtain the best-fit Schechter parameters of erg s, Mpc, and showing a steep faint-end slope. We identify a significant hump at the LF bright end ( erg s). Because all of the LAEs in the bright-end hump have (a) bright counterpart(s) either in the X-ray, UV, or radio data, this bright-end hump is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
