Bayesian inference and model comparison for metallic fatigue data
Ivo Babuska, Zaid Sawlan, Marco Scavino, Barna Szab\'o, Ra\'ul Tempone

TL;DR
This paper develops a comprehensive statistical framework for modeling, comparing, and ranking fatigue life data of aluminum alloys using both classical and Bayesian methods, accommodating censored data and providing robust uncertainty quantification.
Contribution
It introduces a systematic approach combining maximum likelihood and Bayesian techniques for fatigue data analysis, including model calibration, selection, and ranking with new Bayesian model comparison methods.
Findings
Bayesian methods effectively rank fatigue models.
Bootstrap confidence bands assess quantile estimation robustness.
Model comparison via information criteria identifies the best fit.
Abstract
In this work, we present a statistical treatment of stress-life (S-N) data drawn from a collection of records of fatigue experiments that were performed on 75S-T6 aluminum alloys. Our main objective is to predict the fatigue life of materials by providing a systematic approach to model calibration, model selection and model ranking with reference to S-N data. To this purpose, we consider fatigue-limit models and random fatigue-limit models that are specially designed to allow the treatment of the run-outs (right-censored data). We first fit the models to the data by maximum likelihood methods and estimate the quantiles of the life distribution of the alloy specimen. To assess the robustness of the estimation of the quantile functions, we obtain bootstrap confidence bands by stratified resampling with respect to the cycle ratio. We then compare and rank the models by classical measures…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
