Hierarchical Sparse Modeling: A Choice of Two Group Lasso Formulations
Xiaohan Yan, Jacob Bien

TL;DR
This paper compares two convex regularizer frameworks, group lasso and latent overlapping group lasso, for hierarchical sparse modeling, analyzing their statistical properties and computational efficiency, and introduces new algorithms and a covariance estimation method.
Contribution
It provides a systematic comparison of GL and LOG frameworks for hierarchical sparse modeling, including new algorithms and a novel LOG-based covariance estimator.
Findings
LOG has less aggressive shrinkage than GL in hierarchies.
Proposed algorithms significantly improve LOG's computational performance.
LOG-based covariance estimator achieves similar statistical benefits as GL-based methods.
Abstract
Demanding sparsity in estimated models has become a routine practice in statistics. In many situations, we wish to require that the sparsity patterns attained honor certain problem-specific constraints. Hierarchical sparse modeling (HSM) refers to situations in which these constraints specify that one set of parameters be set to zero whenever another is set to zero. In recent years, numerous papers have developed convex regularizers for this form of sparsity structure, which arises in many areas of statistics including interaction modeling, time series analysis, and covariance estimation. In this paper, we observe that these methods fall into two frameworks, the group lasso (GL) and latent overlapping group lasso (LOG), which have not been systematically compared in the context of HSM. The purpose of this paper is to provide a side-by-side comparison of these two frameworks for HSM in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
