CCharge-multiplicity dependence of single-particle transverse-rapidity $\bf y_t$ and pseudorapidity $\bf \eta$ densities and 2D angular correlations from 200 GeV $p$-$p$ collisions
Thomas A. Trainor, Duncan J. Prindle

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how charge multiplicity affects single-particle densities and angular correlations in 200 GeV proton-proton collisions, providing a comprehensive model that includes a nonjet quadrupole component and implications for collectivity and flow phenomena.
Contribution
It introduces a self-consistent two-component model for hadron production in $p$-$p$ collisions, revealing a significant nonjet quadrupole component and exploring its implications for small-system collectivity.
Findings
Identification of a significant nonjet quadrupole component in $p$-$p$ collisions.
Charge-multiplicity dependence of 2D angular correlations and single-particle densities.
Implications for $p$-$p$ centrality, underlying event, and collectivity in small systems.
Abstract
An established phenomenology and theoretical interpretation of - collision data at lower collision energies should provide a reference for - and other collision systems at higher energies, against which claims of novel physics may be tested. The description of - collisions at the relativistic heavy ion collider (RHIC) has remained incomplete even as claims for collectivity and other novelties in data from smaller systems at the large hadron collider (LHC) have emerged recently. In this study we report the charge-multiplicity dependence of two-dimensional (2D) angular correlations and of single-particle (SP) densities on transverse rapidity and pseudorapidity from 200 GeV - collisions. We define a comprehensive and self-consistent two-component (soft + hard) model (TCM) for hadron production and report a significant - nonjet (NJ) quadrupole…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
