Almost lossless analog signal separation and probabilistic uncertainty relations
David Stotz, Erwin Riegler, Eirikur Agustsson, Helmut B\"olcskei

TL;DR
This paper introduces an information-theoretic framework for analog signal separation, providing bounds on measurement rates and new probabilistic uncertainty relations that extend compressed sensing concepts to low description complexity signals.
Contribution
It develops a novel probabilistic uncertainty relation for signal separation, generalizes compressed sensing beyond sparsity, and strengthens existing results in analog compression.
Findings
Achievability bounds for measurement rates under measurable and H"older continuous separators.
A matching converse for sources with mixed discrete-continuous distributions.
Introduction of regularized probabilistic uncertainty relations for low complexity signals.
Abstract
We propose an information-theoretic framework for analog signal separation. Specifically, we consider the problem of recovering two analog signals, modeled as general random vectors, from the noiseless sum of linear measurements of the signals. Our framework is inspired by the groundbreaking work of Wu and Verd\'u (2010) on analog compression and encompasses, inter alia, inpainting, declipping, super-resolution, the recovery of signals corrupted by impulse noise, and the separation of (e.g., audio or video) signals into two distinct components. The main results we report are general achievability bounds for the compression rate, i.e., the number of measurements relative to the dimension of the ambient space the signals live in, under either measurability or H\"older continuity imposed on the separator. Furthermore, we find a matching converse for sources of mixed discrete-continuous…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
