Bayesian non-parametric inference for $\Lambda$-coalescents: consistency and a parametric method
Jere Koskela, Paul A. Jenkins, Dario Span\`o

TL;DR
This paper develops Bayesian methods for inferring the $ ext{Lambda}$-measure in $ ext{Lambda}$-coalescent models, establishing consistency criteria, analyzing likelihood properties, and proposing algorithms for posterior sampling, with a focus on moment inference.
Contribution
It introduces verifiable criteria for posterior consistency, analyzes likelihood invariance across measures with matching moments, and proposes computational algorithms for Bayesian inference in $ ext{Lambda}$-coalescents.
Findings
Posterior consistency depends on the observation scheme.
Likelihood is constant for measures with matching leading moments.
Pseudo-marginal algorithms are effective for posterior sampling.
Abstract
We investigate Bayesian non-parametric inference of the -measure of -coalescent processes with recurrent mutation, parametrised by probability measures on the unit interval. We give verifiable criteria on the prior for posterior consistency when observations form a time series, and prove that any non-trivial prior is inconsistent when all observations are contemporaneous. We then show that the likelihood given a data set of size is constant across -measures whose leading moments agree, and focus on inferring truncated sequences of moments. We provide a large class of functionals which can be extremised using finite computation given a credible region of posterior truncated moment sequences, and a pseudo-marginal Metropolis-Hastings algorithm for sampling the posterior. Finally, we compare the efficiency of the exact and noisy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
