Age-aggregation bias in mortality trends
Andrew Gelman, Jonathan Auerbach

TL;DR
This paper reanalyzes mortality trends among middle-aged U.S. whites, revealing that age-adjustment alters the perceived increase in mortality and shows sex-specific and regional variations, refining previous conclusions.
Contribution
It introduces an age-adjustment method to correct aggregation bias in mortality trend analysis, providing a more accurate understanding of demographic and regional differences.
Findings
No steady increase in age-adjusted mortality after 2005
Significant increase in mortality among women in the South
Declining mortality rates in the Northeast region
Abstract
In a recent article in PNAS, Case and Deaton show a figure illustrating "a marked increase in the all-cause mortality of middle-aged white non-Hispanic men and women in the United States between 1999 and 2013." The authors state that their numbers "are not age-adjusted within the 10-y 45-54 age group." They calculated the mortality rate each year by dividing the total number of deaths for the age group by the population of the age group. We suspected an aggregation bias. After adjusting for changes in age composition, we find there is no longer a steady increase in mortality rates for this age group. Instead there is an increasing trend from 1999-2005 and a constant trend thereafter. Moreover, stratifying age-adjusted mortality rates by sex shows a marked increase only for women and not men, contrary to the article's headline. We stress that this does not change a key finding of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
