The global impact distribution of Near-Earth objects
Clemens Rumpf, Hugh G. Lewis, Peter M. Atkinson

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the global impact distribution of Near-Earth Objects using a new tool, ARMOR, confirming that impact corridors generally follow a uniform distribution, but impact probabilities introduce significant variation.
Contribution
The paper introduces and validates the ARMOR tool for impact probability projection, extending the understanding of impact distribution assumptions with quantitative analysis.
Findings
Impact corridors match the uniform distribution assumption.
Impact probabilities cause significant deviations from uniformity.
The study extends the impact distribution analysis to future impact scenarios.
Abstract
Asteroids that could collide with the Earth are listed on the publicly available Near-Earth object (NEO) hazard web sites maintained by the US and European space agencies (NASA and ESA). The impact probability distribution of 69 potentially threatening NEOs from these lists that produce 261 dynamically distinct impact instances, or Virtual Impactors (VIs), were calculated using the Asteroid Risk Mitigation and Optimization Research (ARMOR) tool in conjunction with OrbFit. ARMOR projected the impact probability of each VI onto the surface of the Earth as a spatial probability distribution. The projection considers orbit solution accuracy and the global impact probability. The method of ARMOR is introduced and the tool is validated against two asteroid-Earth collision cases with objects 2008 TC3 and 2014 AA. In the analysis, the natural distribution of impact corridors is contrasted…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
