Cosmic Censorship in Lorentz Violating Theories of Gravity
Michael Meiers, Mehdi Saravani, Niayesh Afshordi

TL;DR
This paper investigates the robustness of Cosmic Censorship in Lorentz violating gravity theories, showing that universal horizons prevent singularities from being observable, even in complex spinning black hole spacetimes.
Contribution
It extends previous results to 3+1d dynamical and spinning spacetimes, demonstrating the formation of universal horizons that uphold a form of Cosmic Censorship in Einstein-Aether theories.
Findings
Universal horizons form between outer and inner horizons in spinning black holes.
Geometry never evolves beyond the universal horizon, preventing exposure of singularities.
Multiple stationary universal horizons exist for spinning black holes, with only one matching spherical solutions.
Abstract
Is Cosmic Censorship special to General Relativity, or can it survive a violation of equivalence principle? Recent studies have shown that singularities in Lorentz violating Einstein-Aether (or Horava-Lifhsitz) theories can lie behind a universal horizon in simple black hole spacetimes. Even infinitely fast signals cannot escape these universal horizons. We extend this result, for an incompressible aether, to 3+1d dynamical or spinning spacetimes which possess inner killing horizons, and show that a universal horizon always forms in between the outer and (would-be) inner horizons. This finding suggests a notion of Cosmic Censorship, given that geometry in these theories never evolves beyond the universal horizon (avoiding potentially singular inner killing horizons). A surprising result is that there are 3 distinct possible stationary universal horizons for a spinning black hole, only…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
