Inferred H{\alpha} Flux as a Star-Formation Rate Indicator at z ~ 4-5: Implications for Dust Properties, Burstiness, and the z = 4-8 Star-Formation-Rate Functions
Renske Smit, Rychard J. Bouwens, Ivo Labb\'e, Marijn Franx, Stephen M., Wilkins, Pascal A. Oesch

TL;DR
This study infers Hα fluxes for high-redshift galaxies to evaluate their star-formation rates, revealing insights into dust properties, star-formation burstiness, and the evolution of star-formation rate functions at z ~ 4-8.
Contribution
It introduces a novel method to infer Hα fluxes from IRAC data and assesses their correlation with UV SFRs, providing new constraints on high-redshift galaxy star formation.
Findings
Hα flux correlates with dust-corrected UV SFRs at z ~ 4-5.
Systematic offsets in SFR ratios can be explained by dust, metallicity, or star-formation history assumptions.
Star formation in z ~ 4 galaxies appears relatively steady, not bursty.
Abstract
We derive H{\alpha} fluxes for a large spectroscopic and photometric-redshift-selected sample of sources over GOODS-North and South in the redshift range z = 3.8-5.0 with deep HST, Spitzer/IRAC, and ground-based observations. The H{\alpha} flux is inferred based on the offset between the IRAC 3.6 {\mu}m flux and that predicted from the best-fit SED. We demonstrate that the H{\alpha} flux correlates well with dust- corrected UV star-formation rate (SFR) and therefore can serve as an independent SFR indicator. However, we also find a systematic offset in the SFR_H{\alpha}/SFR_UV ratios for z ~ 4-5 galaxies relative to local relations (assuming the same dust corrections for nebular regions and stellar light). We show that we can resolve the modest tension in the inferred SFRs by assuming bluer intrinsic UV slopes (increasing the dust correction), a rising star-formation history or assuming…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
