Polynomials, Quantum Query Complexity, and Grothendieck's Inequality
Scott Aaronson, Andris Ambainis, J\=anis Iraids, Martins Kokainis,, Juris Smotrovs

TL;DR
This paper establishes a fundamental equivalence between 1-query quantum algorithms and degree-2 polynomial approximations, explores limitations for higher degrees, and solves an open problem on polynomial estimation complexity.
Contribution
It proves the equivalence between 1-query quantum algorithms and degree-2 polynomials under two approximation notions, and clarifies the relationship between polynomial degree and quantum query complexity.
Findings
1-query quantum algorithms correspond to degree-2 polynomial approximations.
A total Boolean function requires many quantum queries but can be approximated by low-degree polynomials.
For constant degree k, standard and block-multilinear polynomial approximations are equivalent.
Abstract
We show an equivalence between 1-query quantum algorithms and representations by degree-2 polynomials. Namely, a partial Boolean function is computable by a 1-query quantum algorithm with error bounded by iff can be approximated by a degree-2 polynomial with error bounded by . This result holds for two different notions of approximation by a polynomial: the standard definition of Nisan and Szegedy and the approximation by block-multilinear polynomials recently introduced by Aaronson and Ambainis (STOC'2015, arxiv:1411.5729). We also show two results for polynomials of higher degree. First, there is a total Boolean function which requires quantum queries but can be represented by a block-multilinear polynomial of degree . Thus, in the general case (for an arbitrary number of queries), block-multilinear…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
