Universality and stationarity of the I-Love relation for self-bound stars
T. K. Chan, AtMa P. O. Chan, P. T. Leung

TL;DR
This paper analytically investigates the I-Love relation for self-bound stars, demonstrating its universality and stationarity near incompressible stars, and providing a new physical explanation for this universal behavior.
Contribution
It formulates perturbative expansions for self-bound stars and analytically shows the I-Love relation's universality and stationarity near incompressible stars, offering a novel physical insight.
Findings
The I-Love relation is stationary with respect to EOS variations near incompressible stars.
The moment of inertia and tidal deformability of self-bound stars are approximately equal to those of incompressible stars with adjusted compactness.
The universality of the I-Love relation is due to the proximity of self-bound stars to incompressible stars.
Abstract
The emergence of the I-Love-Q relations, revealing that the moment of inertia, the tidal Love number (deformability) and the spin-induced quadrupole moment of compact stars are, to high accuracy, interconnected in a universal way disregarding the wide variety of equations of state (EOSs) of dense matter, has attracted much interest recently. However, the physical origin of these relations is still a debatable issue. In the present paper, we focus on the I-Love relation for self-bound stars (SBSs) such as incompressible stars and quark stars. We formulate perturbative expansions for the moment of inertia, the tidal Love number (deformability) and the I-Love relation of SBSs. By comparing the respective I-Love relations of incompressible stars and a specific kind of SBSs, we show analytically that the I-Love relation is, to relevant leading orders in stellar compactness, stationary with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
