TL;DR
This review compares various methods for estimating orbital actions in galactic dynamics, introducing a new approach, and evaluates their accuracy and computational efficiency for different galactic components.
Contribution
The paper provides a comprehensive comparison of existing action estimation methods and introduces a novel method based on the adiabatic approximation.
Findings
St"ackel Fudge offers the best speed-accuracy balance for the Milky Way's disc and halo.
Orbit integration with generating functions is most accurate for stellar streams.
Non-convergent methods are less suitable for precise stream studies.
Abstract
We review the available methods for estimating actions, angles and frequencies of orbits in both axisymmetric and triaxial potentials. The methods are separated into two classes. Unless an orbit has been trapped by a resonance, convergent, or iterative, methods are able to recover the actions to arbitrarily high accuracy given sufficient computing time. Faster non-convergent methods rely on the potential being sufficiently close to a separable potential and the accuracy of the action estimate cannot be improved through further computation. We critically compare the accuracy of the methods and the required computation time for a range of orbits in an axisymmetric multi-component Galactic potential. We introduce a new method for estimating actions that builds on the adiabatic approximation of Sch\"onich & Binney (2012) and discuss the accuracy required for the actions, angles and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
