Experimental comparison of various techniques for spot size measurement of high-energy x-ray source
Yi Wang, Qin Li, Nan Chen, Jinming Cheng, Chenggang Li, Wenhua Dai,, Hong Li, Quanhong Long, Jinshui Shi, Jianjun Deng

TL;DR
This paper compares different imaging techniques like pinhole, slit, and rollbar for measuring the focal spot size of high-energy x-ray sources, crucial for image quality in flash-radiography.
Contribution
It provides an experimental comparison of multiple methods for x-ray source spot measurement, highlighting their advantages and differences.
Findings
Pinhole imaging offers a 2D distribution of the x-ray spot.
Slit and rollbar techniques provide line and edge spread distributions.
Different measurement definitions yield comparable spot size results.
Abstract
In the experiment of flash-radiography, the quality of acquired image strongly depends on the focal size of the x-ray source spot. A variety of techniques based on imaging of pinhole, slit and rollbar are adopted to measure the focal spot size of the Dragon-I linear induction accelerator. The image of pinhole provides a two-dimensional distribution of the x-ray spot, while those of slit and rollbar give a line-spread distribution and an edge-spread distribution, respectively. The spot size characterized by full-width at half-maximum and that characterized by the LANL definition are calculated for comparison.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
