Top-N recommendations from expressive recommender systems
Cyril Stark

TL;DR
This paper evaluates normalized nonnegative models for top-N recommendations, demonstrating they are as effective as existing methods like PureSVD while offering interpretable representations and theoretical insights.
Contribution
It introduces normalized nonnegative models for recommender systems, analyzing their performance, interpretability, and theoretical properties, including NP-hardness and relationships to matrix factorization.
Findings
Normalized nonnegative models match PureSVD in recommendation accuracy.
They provide interpretable user and item representations.
Inference of optimal models is NP-hard.
Abstract
Normalized nonnegative models assign probability distributions to users and random variables to items; see [Stark, 2015]. Rating an item is regarded as sampling the random variable assigned to the item with respect to the distribution assigned to the user who rates the item. Models of that kind are highly expressive. For instance, using normalized nonnegative models we can understand users' preferences as mixtures of interpretable user stereotypes, and we can arrange properties of users and items in a hierarchical manner. These features would not be useful if the predictive power of normalized nonnegative models was poor. Thus, we analyze here the performance of normalized nonnegative models for top-N recommendation and observe that their performance matches the performance of methods like PureSVD which was introduced in [Cremonesi et al., 2010]. We conclude that normalized nonnegative…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRecommender Systems and Techniques · Topic Modeling · Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
