Cosmology with Superluminous Supernovae
Dario Scovacricchi (ICG Portsmouth), Robert C. Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth), David Bacon (ICG Portsmouth), Mark Sullivan (University of, Southampton), Szymon Prajs (University of Southampton)

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the potential of Superluminous Supernovae as high-redshift standard candles to improve cosmological parameter constraints, demonstrating their value in combination with other surveys and datasets.
Contribution
It introduces a methodology for simulating SLSNe-based cosmological constraints and quantifies their impact when combined with existing supernova data and future surveys.
Findings
Adding ~100 SLSNe to DES improves w and Omega_m constraints by 20%.
Combining LSST-like SLSNe with DES SNe Ia measures Omega_m and w to 2% and 4%.
SLSNe can constrain dark energy evolution with uncertainties of 2%, 5%, and 14%.
Abstract
We predict cosmological constraints for forthcoming surveys using Superluminous Supernovae (SLSNe) as standardisable candles. Due to their high peak luminosity, these events can be observed to high redshift (z~3), opening up new possibilities to probe the Universe in the deceleration epoch. We describe our methodology for creating mock Hubble diagrams for the Dark Energy Survey (DES), the "Search Using DECam for Superluminous Supernovae" (SUDSS) and a sample of SLSNe possible from the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST), exploring a range of standardisation values for SLSNe. We include uncertainties due to gravitational lensing and marginalise over possible uncertainties in the magnitude scale of the observations (e.g. uncertain absolute peak magnitude, calibration errors). We find that the addition of only ~100 SLSNe from SUDSS to 3800 Type Ia Supernovae (SNe Ia) from DES can…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
