`Ferroelectric' Metals Reexamined: Fundamental Mechanisms and Design Considerations for New Materials
Nicole A. Benedek, Turan Birol

TL;DR
This paper investigates the mechanisms behind polar distortions in metallic and insulating materials, challenging the notion that free electrons always suppress ferroelectricity, and proposes new design principles for polar metals.
Contribution
It demonstrates that local bonding preferences can drive polar distortions in metals, providing a new perspective on designing polar metallic materials.
Findings
Electrostatic forces are crucial in BaTiO₃ but less so in CaTiO₃ and LiOsO₃.
Polar phases in some metals are driven by local bonding, resistant to charge carriers.
Design principles for new polar metals are proposed based on bonding mechanisms.
Abstract
The recent observation of a ferroelectric-like structural transition in metallic LiOsO has generated a flurry of interest in the properties of polar metals. Such materials are thought to be rare because free electrons screen out the long-range electrostatic forces that favor a polar structure with a dipole moment in every unit cell. In this work, we question whether long-range electrostatic forces are always the most important ingredient in driving polar distortions. We use crystal chemical models, in combination with first-principles Density Functional Theory calculations, to explore the mechanisms of inversion-symmetry breaking in LiOsO and both insulating and electron-doped ATiO perovskites, A = Ba, Sr, Ca. Although electrostatic forces do play a significant role in driving the polar instability of BaTiO (which is suppressed under electron doping), the polar phases of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
