Identification of nuclear effects in neutrino-carbon interactions at low three-momentum transfer
P.A. Rodrigues, J. Demgen, E. Miltenberger, L. Aliaga, O. Altinok, L., Bellantoni, A. Bercellie, M. Betancourt, A. Bodek, A. Bravar, H. Budd, T., Kai, M.F. Carneiro, J. Chvojka, J. Devan, S.A. Dytman, G.A. Diaz, B. Eberly,, M. Elkins, J. Felix, L. Fields, R. Fine, A.M. Gago

TL;DR
This paper isolates and analyzes nuclear-medium effects in low three-momentum transfer neutrino-carbon interactions, revealing phenomena like nucleon correlation screening and multi-proton final states, crucial for improving neutrino oscillation models.
Contribution
It identifies and characterizes nuclear effects such as long-range correlations and multi-nucleon interactions in neutrino-carbon scattering at low momentum transfer, providing detailed cross sections for model refinement.
Findings
Observation of a small cross section at very low energy transfer consistent with nucleon correlation screening.
Detection of increased event rates and multi-proton final states between quasielastic and resonance regions.
Model improvements partially explain the data but require further refinement.
Abstract
Two different nuclear-medium effects are isolated using a low three-momentum transfer subsample of neutrino-carbon scattering data from the MINERvA neutrino experiment. The observed hadronic energy in charged-current interactions is combined with muon kinematics to permit separation of the quasielastic and (1232) resonance processes. First, we observe a small cross section at very low energy transfer that matches the expected screening effect of long-range nucleon correlations. Second, additions to the event rate in the kinematic region between the quasielastic and resonance processes are needed to describe the data. The data in this kinematic region also has an enhanced population of multi-proton final states. Contributions predicted for scattering from a nucleon pair have both properties; the model tested in this analysis is a significant improvement but…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
