Trees with small b-chromatic index
Ana Silva

TL;DR
This paper investigates the b-chromatic index of trees, demonstrating that the difference between this index and a known upper bound can be arbitrarily large, correcting previous misconceptions and constructions.
Contribution
It provides a corrected construction of trees with large differences in b-chromatic index and clarifies errors in prior related work.
Findings
The difference between the b-chromatic index and the upper bound can be arbitrarily large for trees.
Previous claims about the bound difference being at most 1 are incorrect for trees.
The paper corrects a mistake in earlier literature regarding the b-chromatic index of trees.
Abstract
In a recent article [5], the authors claim that the distance between the b-chromatic index of a tree and a known upper bound is at most 1. At the same time, in [7] the authors claim to be able to construct a tree where this difference is bigger than 1. However, the given example was disconnected, i.e., actually consisted of a forest. Here, we slightly modify their construction in order to produce trees, thus getting that indeed the difference between the b-chromatic index of trees and the known upper bound can be arbitrarily large. We also point out the mistake made in [5].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
