On the relation of optical obscuration and X-ray absorption in Seyfert galaxies
L. Burtscher, R. I. Davies, J. Gracia-Carpio, M. J. Koss, M.-Y. Lin,, D. Lutz, P. Nandra, H. Netzer, G. Orban de Xivry, C. Ricci, D. J. Rosario, S., Veilleux, A. Contursi, R. Genzel, A. Schnorr-Mueller, A. Sternberg, E. Sturm,, L. J. Tacconi

TL;DR
This study investigates the relationship between optical obscuration and X-ray absorption in Seyfert galaxies, demonstrating that with proper classification and methods, these properties can be consistently correlated, revealing insights into dust and gas properties in AGNs.
Contribution
The paper introduces a consistent approach to compare optical obscuration and X-ray absorption in Seyfert galaxies, clarifying their relationship and the role of dust and gas properties.
Findings
Good agreement between optical and X-ray classifications when using a specific N_H threshold.
N_H/A_V ratio is approximately Galactic or higher, indicating dust and gas properties similar to or exceeding Galactic levels.
Variability in X-ray columns can explain deviations from the Galactic N_H/A_V ratio.
Abstract
The optical classification of a Seyfert galaxy and whether it is considered X-ray absorbed are often used interchangeably. But there are many borderline cases and also numerous examples where the optical and X-ray classifications appear to be in conflict. In this article we re-visit the relation between optical obscuration and X-ray absorption in AGNs. We make use of our "dust color" method (Burtscher et al. 2015) to derive the optical obscuration A_V and consistently estimated X-ray absorbing columns using 0.3--150 keV spectral energy distributions. We also take into account the variable nature of the neutral gas column N_H and derive the Seyfert sub-classes of all our objects in a consistent way. We show in a sample of 25 local, hard-X-ray detected Seyfert galaxies (log L_X / (erg/s) ~ 41.5 - 43.5) that there can actually be a good agreement between optical and X-ray classification.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
