Bell inequalities with three ternary-outcome measurements - from theory to experiments (PLUS A CORRIGENDUM)
Sacha Schwarz, B\"anz Bessire, Andr\'e Stefanov, and Yeong-Cherng, Liang

TL;DR
This paper introduces new Bell inequalities for bipartite systems with three-outcome measurements, showing they can be maximally violated by two-qubit states and demonstrating their experimental violation with photon pairs, challenging common assumptions about measurement outcomes.
Contribution
The work presents novel facet-defining Bell inequalities for the {[3 3 3] [3 3 3]} scenario, including the first example requiring non-projective measurements for maximal violation.
Findings
All inequalities can be maximally violated by two-qubit entangled states.
Experimental violation of these inequalities was successfully demonstrated.
Characterization of quantum resources can be achieved despite finite-size effects.
Abstract
We explore quantum nonlocality in one of the simplest bipartite scenarios. Several new facet-defining Bell inequalities for the {[3 3 3] [3 3 3]} scenario are obtained with their quantum violations analyzed in details. Surprisingly, all these inequalities involving only genuine ternary-outcome measurements can be violated maximally by some two-qubit entangled states, such as the maximally entangled two-qubit state. This gives further evidence that in analyzing the quantum violation of Bell inequalities, or in the application of the latter to device-independent quantum information processing tasks, the commonly-held wisdom of equating the local Hilbert space dimension of the optimal state with the number of measurement outcomes is not necessarily justifiable. In addition, when restricted to the minimal qubit subspace, it can be shown that one of these Bell inequalities requires…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
