Measures of galaxy dust and gas mass with Herschel photometry and prospects for ALMA
S. Berta, D. Lutz, R. Genzel, N.M. Foerster-Schreiber, L.J. Tacconi

TL;DR
This study assesses methods for estimating galaxy dust and gas masses using Herschel photometry, demonstrating the robustness of these estimates across different models and redshifts, and exploring prospects for ALMA observations.
Contribution
It compares two popular dust mass estimation methods, evaluates their accuracy with Herschel data, and discusses implications for future ALMA observations.
Findings
Dust mass can be reliably estimated if SED extends to 160-200 microns.
An offset of ~1.5 exists between DL07 and MBB dust mass estimates.
Dust and gas mass estimates are consistent with other scaling relations.
Abstract
(Abridged) Combining the deepest Herschel extragalactic surveys (PEP, GOODS-H, HerMES), and Monte Carlo mock catalogs, we explore the robustness of dust mass estimates based on modeling of broad band spectral energy distributions (SEDs) with two popular approaches: Draine & Li (2007, DL07) and a modified black body (MBB). As long as the observed SED extends to at least 160-200 micron in the rest frame, M(dust) can be recovered with a >3 sigma significance and without the occurrence of systematics. An average offset of a factor ~1.5 exists between DL07- and MBB-based dust masses, based on consistent dust properties. At the depth of the deepest Herschel surveys (in the GOODS-S field) it is possible to retrieve dust masses with a S/N>=3 for galaxies on the main sequence of star formation (MS) down to M(stars)~1e10 [M(sun)] up to z~1. At higher redshift (z<=2) the same result is achieved…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
